Welcome to the April edition of our Enforcement Actions Roundup, a monthly summary where our regulatory experts break down recent enforcement actions from the previous month, highlight what went wrong, and offer insights to help your institution stay ahead of similar risks.
The Enforcement Actions Roundup includes two key elements:
Let’s get into it.
Fair Lending | Advertising | AML/CFT | Underwriting | UDAAP | Electronic Funds Transfers | Insider Activities | Flood Insurance | Financial Risk | Concentration | Military Lending | |
CFPB | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
OCC | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
FRB | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
FDIC | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
NCUA |
Please note that a single enforcement action may be included under multiple topics.
There were no new institutional enforcement actions by the CFPB in March 2025. However, the CFPB decided to continue to prosecute a lender for violations of the Military Lending Act and UDAAP. To ensure an accurate portrayal of the CFPB’s priorities, this enforcement action has been added.
The lender allegedly violated the Military Lending Act (MLA) by charging military borrowers membership fees that resulted in loan costs exceeding the 36% rate cap, including mandatory arbitration clauses in loan agreements, and failing to provide required disclosures such as the Military Annual Percentage Rate. Additionally, the lender is accused of deceptive practices under the Consumer Financial Protection Act by misleading consumers about their ability to cancel memberships while restricting cancellations for those with unpaid balances.
The protection of veterans and service members will be a top priority for the new administration and agency leadership. At a time when the CFPB has been dropping enforcement actions and lawsuits left and right, it made a statement by authorizing the continued prosecution of this lender.
Pay close attention to the CFPB’s use of its UDAAP authority in this case. The CFPB has repeatedly stated that it is going to end regulation by enforcement and focus on specific violations of law or regulation. Those statements created questions of whether UDAAP would be used against financial institutions. It looks like the CFPB answered that question here, opting to continue using UDAAP in its enforcement toolbelt.
If your institution has a heavy concentration of veterans or active service members, you should have a sound compliance management system to protect against consumer protection violations. Now is the time to ensure that your policies, procedures, and practices guarantee compliance with the Military Lending Act and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
See additional enforcement actions below.
The FRB issued a civil monetary penalty of $15,500 against a bank for flood insurance violations. The bank had a pattern or practice of violations regarding loans in special flood hazard areas.
Flood insurance continues to be an area of heightened regulatory attention. One of the most common violations is failing to ensure flood insurance is obtained at the time of making, increasing, renewing, or extending a loan.
Policies, procedures, and controls to verify insurance coverage and monitor for proper coverage at renewal are required for your institution. Additionally, third-party vendors used to track flood map changes should be monitored, as they might not be as attentive to changes as they should be. Remember that civil monetary penalties are based on the number of violations, with up to $2,000 for each flood insurance violation.
Remember that civil monetary penalties are based on the number of violations, with up to $2,000 for each flood insurance violation.
There were no institutional enforcement actions released by the FDIC in March.
There were no institutional enforcement actions by the NCUA in March.
Want more regulatory news and updates?
Watch our 2025 Regulatory Expectations & Enforcement Webinar on demand.