For years regulatory agencies, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, have emphasized the importance of enterprise risk management (ERM) at financial institutions. Now the OCC is taking its own advice—and sharing its findings.
The agency’s recently released “Enterprise Risk Appetite Statement1” is the work of its Office of Enterprise Risk management, a function created last summer to “identify, evaluate, and manage risks to the agency,” according to the press release announcing its creation.
But more than that, it gives us a strong example of best practices.
Financial institutions should use a similar approach, including vendor management, cyber security, business continuity planning and compliance under the umbrella of enterprise risk management for cohesive planning.
It wasn’t a broad exercise. The agency dove into the details, separately assessing subcategories and giving the reasons for its assigned risk appetite.
For example, while the OCC has a low overall appetite for technology risk—including no risk tolerance for data security or business continuity planning—its open to moderate risk when it comes to innovative technology solutions.
This shows risk management isn’t a simple yes or no situation. It’s a careful discussion that balances safety and soundness with flexibility and opportunities for innovation. Reasons for every decision should be carefully documented.
Related: Shelved Elves: Santa Ponders the Risks and Rewards of Outsourcing Toy Making
Not only does she have the ear of the executive team, she has the power to ensure that the agency’s risk management objectives and strategies are communicated across the OCC—critical to making the initiative a success.
Financial institutions should be following the OCC’s lead on ERM. Make sure you have a strategic ERM plan that uses a holistic approach to risk management—one where every major risk category is systematically evaluated. Recognize the need for innovation, creativity and efficiency when assessing the institution’s risk comfort level—and document the reasons why. And put someone with authority in charge, ensuring that ERM is not just a thought exercise, but a central, bank-wide priority.